NOW UTAH WANTS A "MULLIGAN" TOO.

photo credit: Trent Nelson

Utah Supreme Court weighs whether to step into FLDS trust case

(Now that the shit hit the fan and they got whacked, they want another shot at it.)

By lindsay whitehurst

Updated Apr 13, 2011 12:01AM

Utah Supreme Court justices questioned attorneys Tuesday on whether a federal judge elbowed out the state’s highest court when he ruled the state of Utah acted illegally in taking over a polygamous sect’s land trust.

“Isn’t that the sort of thing a state court should weigh in on before a decision of this magnitude is made?” asked Justice Thomas Lee during a rehearing of two pending appeal cases related to the trust.

(They HAD the chance back in August, 2010 and somebody on the Court came up with the idiotic idea of laches. NOW, they want to do it all over again, this time, trying to steal the trust "Legally".)

The trust case turned into a standoff this week when a state judge stepped up to defy a federal injunction temporarily returning control of the trust to the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

(If you want to call telling a Federal Judge to "Fuck off" a "Standoff", then I guess you might be right. Normally it's called Contempt of Court.)

“We’re at a pretty monumental crossroads here,” Lee said. 

(Yeah, I would say so. Telling a Federal Judge to fuck himself isn't the smartest thing Lindberg could have done to advance her Judicial career.)

“We have two court systems lobbing controversial court orders.”

(We have a State Court choosing to ignore a Federal Court's Ruling.)

But the Utah Supreme Court could still be holding a trump card in the increasingly complex court battle.

(At least that's what the Utah Supreme Court hopes and prays. I sure do wish the Utah Court could show us ONE case where the State overruled the Federal Judiciary on Constitutional grounds.)

When U.S. District Judge Dee Benson made his decision, he was considering a case that the state high court had already dismissed because justices decided the FLDS waited too long to challenge the state takeover.

(Unlike the State Court, Benson KNEW that there's no such thing as laches applying to a Constitutional Right (Separation of Church and State). 

Even though cases usually can’t be tried more than once, Benson decided he could rule because the Utah Supreme Court dismissed the case before considering the sect’s argument that the takeover violated the Constitution.

("USUALLY" is the operative word. Anybody recall Rodney King? When the State failed to convict, the Fed's moved in and did it for them. The Fed's pull that skam ALL the time with the State's blessings.)

But Benson didn’t ask the Utah Supreme Court if its decision was binding.

(It sounds like the Supreme's are saying the FLDS should have ignored the Ruling they made in August. Was this another "Not intended as a factual statement" on the part of the Supreme Court? Should the FLDS just have ignored them because they really didn't mean it?)

“We reviewed the facts. They were all presented to us,” Justice Matthew Durrant said. “If one’s claim is of significant magnitude, can one sit on that claim indefinitely?”

(Do the words; "Unalienable Rights" mean anything to you, you moron?)

If the justices decide their ruling was binding, it could sideline Benson — and his decision last week to temporarily give back control of the communal property trust to the FLDS Church. 

(All the Justices have to do is to Rule that the State Courts trump the Federal Court's and Constitutional Law. The last time somebody tried that was 150 years ago at Ft. Sumpter.)

It would be the first time in six years that the Warren S. Jeffs-led sect would run the $110 million trust that holds most members’ homes, businesses and land in Hildale and Colorado City, Ariz., as well as those in a Canadian settlement.

(Irrelevant to the case at hand. Utah doesn't get to choose who the Pope is going to be.)

The Utah Supreme Court is also weighing how Benson’s decision affects two other pending cases it is considering in the long-running legal battle over the trust.

(They are "Considering" it about as earnestly as the Court is considering the criminal charges against Brucellosis.) 

One deals with whether a handful of sect members should have a legal voice in the case and the other is about whether longtime FLDS attorney Rod Parker should be disqualified from representing the group.

(What case would that be? The one that was "Dismissed" last August? Why would they rule on a dead case?) (Do they REALLY believe they control who represents the FLDS? If they dismissed the case, what exactly would Rod be representing them for that is before the Court since August?)

Attorneys for the FLDS Church say the court should stay those decisions until the federal case — including an appeal of Benson’s decision — is worked out. 

(Attorney's for the FLDS should be TELLING the Utah Supreme Court that it should not be suborning Contempt of Court by one of their bimbets.)

Attorneys for Utah and Arizona, as well as the accountant who runs the trust, disagree, saying the high court should make its own decisions, including the one that could affect the federal case.

("Runs" is actually past tense. As of Benson's Ruling, they no longer control the Trust and are in Contempt as long as they continue to ignore the Federal Courts Ruling. I would have asked for a DAILY monetary sanction against Lindberg until she complies, or gets herself a LEGAL Stay of the Federal Court Order.)

In the background, a series of recent excommunications by Jeffs and an internal church power struggle mean it’s unclear who’s a member of the church and who would be in charge of the trust if it changes hands.

“Someone’s got to sort this out,” Lee said. 

(I know you have a pretty good ego Mr. Lee, but who runs the Church is absolutely none of your fucking business, just stick to Constitutional Law and get out of the Trust business as you've been properly Ordered by a REAL Court of Law.)

ARIZONA GETS REAL WHILE UTAH TRIES TO SAVE FACE.

For those who do not remember it, this "Deal" Utah is claiming as a Victory for it self concerning the U.E.P. Trust is about as much a "Victory" as the return of the children held by Texas was for the CPS and CASA dykes and "Judge" barbie.

As you may recall back then, Texas said that while the children were going to be going back home, that DID NOT mean that CPS and CASA were going to be putting their tail between their legs and running away, they were still going to "Monitor and control" the children. They were still going to be involved with them, and their parents in seeing to it that the children were "Safe". Sure they were!

They haven't been back since and every single child is completely free of their abuse and neglect.

Now tearing a page out of Texas history comes the State of Utah trying to save face.
They are claiming that they will give the F LDS Church back the Trust "For now" and with conditions.

Mark now claims that at some point a year or so down the road, he will Appeal the bitch slapping of Lindberg and retake the Trust. The success of that Appeal won't come in the Utah AG's lifetime, that's a certainty, but I guess it does wrap up some loose ends for him.

He also thinks the Trust is going to pay Wisan, and that Wisan is going to stay on as Trespasser in Chief. The fact is, once the Trust is back under the Churches control, like the children's return, he can huff and puff all he wants, it's no longer his call.

Wisan and the ambulance chasers along with the book selling pole dancers can certainly sue for the money they are owed, but all they need to do is to convince a real Court of Law that the Trust owes a debt incurred while it's Rights were being unconstitutionally violated and they have to pay their thief's for their efforts. Good Luck on THAT one brucie!

The only entity being somewhat realistic in this situation is the State of Arizona who will not sign off on handing the Trust back. They at least are not delusional in thinking that the Church is going to remain under Utah's boot while they run to the 10th Circuit for salvation. Arizona says there's no way they're going to hand over the Trust to Warren Jeffs. One has to wonder what they don't understand about Judge Benson's Ruling that Warren Jeff's has NOTHING to do with the un constitutionality of the theft of the Trust. Arizona simply has no say in where the Trust goes.

The bottom line after all the pissing that went on today by everybody is that Judge Benson will be deciding the issue since Utah and Arizona STILL THINKS they are in the Trust business. What they all need to do is to sit down and read Benson's 48 pages of bitch slapping and live with it, face, or no face.  

UTAH DECIDES IT WILL APPOINT CHURCH LEADERS.

In a move Adolf would have been proud of, the State of Utah has decided IT will now tell the F LDS Church who is going to be their Bishop and Stake President.

The State is in Federal Court TODAY to explain how it is going to get itself OUT of Church business after un Constitutionally taking over the Churches Trust, but I guess they like being hauled into Federal Court, and spending all those Tax dollars defending the un defendable, that they want to show the Judge how REALLY ignorant about the Law they can get. NOW, The State of Utah will tell the Church who their Leader is, in their opinion. I wonder what the Feds are going to be saying about THIS takeover?


Control of polygamous sect appears headed to court

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah state officials are blocking any further attempts by rival church leaders to seize control of Warren Jeffs' polygamous sect, which likely means a judge will decide.

The commerce department's Division of Corporations has placed an administrative hold on the two legal entities that comprise the Hildale, Utah-based Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The hold is in place until May 2, according to a memo from the division's director, Kathy Berg.

Last week, church elder William E. Jessop, 41, filed to take over the church presidency from Jeffs, who is currently in a Texas jail awaiting trials on criminal charges of bigamy and sexual assault of a minor.

Days later, Jeffs loyalist Boyd Knudsen shot back with a counter-filing that removed Jessop and reinstated Jeffs. Knudsen, the registered agent for the church corporation, also claimed in twin affidavits that Jessop had falsely claimed any authority in the church.

In a second set of affidavits filed Monday, Knudsen claimed some 4,000 members unanimously voted Sunday to support Jeffs' presidency.
The papers also say the same group renounced Jessop as "not a part of said church."

It's not clear from the filing where the "general assembly" of church members occurred. The papers say church members stood to "raise their hands and voices" in Jeffs' favor.

Utah Department of Commerce spokeswoman Jennifer Bolton said Tuesday she could not say which person is now recognized by the state as the FLDS president.
When types of disputes arise in corporations, commerce officials grant the parties up to 30 days to settle the matter, or look to the courts to settle the dispute.

Rod Parker, a Salt Lake City attorney who represents the church in civil court matters, declined to comment on Tuesday.

A message left for church spokesman Willie Jessop also was not returned.
Jeffs, 55, has been the president and ecclesiastical head of the FLDS church since 2002.

In 2007, after being convicted in Utah of rape as accomplice charges, he handed over the job as president to another church leader. In January, however, that elder resigned and Jeffs reinstated himself.

William Jessop, the former bishop of the FLDS border towns of Hildale and Colorado City, Ariz., has said his attempt to assume the presidency fulfills a 2007 directive from Jeffs himself.

"I know of your ordination, that you are the key holder, and I have sent a note with my signature so that there is no question," Jeffs told Jessop in the Jan. 24, 2007, telephone call.

Jeffs told his family and other church leaders the same thing in other calls made at the same time. Recordings of the calls were released by the Utah courts as part of Jeffs' case.

Jeffs is set for trials later this year in Texas. A court has entered not guilty pleas on his behalf. His Utah convictions were overturned last year.

D-DAY FOR UTAH TO GET OUT OF THE TRUST BUSINESS

Today is the day that the Federal Court has given the State's of Utah and Arizona, as well as a jerk Utah Judge and her criminally charged accountant, to explain exactly how it's going to get it's ass out of the United Effort Plans Trust.

Reversing all of Wisan's criminal activity over the past 6 years will be the least of his worries, since his un constitutional involvement in somebody else's business now leaves him wide-open to change his Misdemeanor charges to Felonies. His failure to immediately cease and desist after being informed of his illegal practices by a Federal Judge isn't going to help his case much, since he can's hide under the skirts of Dan Fisher's puppet anymore by claiming ignorance of the Constitution or "I was only following Orders". When a Federal Judge tell's you you're being a bad boy, you DON"T turn around and moon him Brucie boy!

For Mark's part, he'll claim "I told you so" to his bosses in the LDS who have been giving him his marching orders in this case, but he really isn't all that concerned with this case in view of his condition. A more pressing matter is his choice of who he's going to be meeting in the hereafter. I wouldn't be too worried about Barbara or William Jessop, but hopefully, Val will have some words about being persecuted to death by Mark. I know damned sure he wouldn't want to meet me!

The good news for Mark is that he will now be able to claim his brides and become a polygamist in Heaven. Ironic; the man spends his life on earth persecuting the same folks he yearns to be in Heaven. As an outsider, perhaps the Quorum of the 12 can explain how this Doctrine is not the most hypocritical pack of bullshit in the world! Do they believe the Jews eat pork chops up there? Do they believe Muslims love their Christian brothers? Fascinating!

As for Denise, all her hopes and dreams of a "Higher calling" on the Bench have gone up in polygamist smoke. Maybe she should have stayed a Catholic and become a Miami pole dancer. Well, cheer up Denise, you can always get a job cleaning teeth in Dan's place. Maybe you could write a book. How about; "How I partied during Law School". We could file it in the Dewey Decimal System under "Self Destructive Behaviors".

As for the State's; You boys need to go back to the budget room and figure out how your going to reimburse 6,000 individuals (Plus their relatives) who were screwed by you over the past 6 years out of their rightful property.

Yes, it is true that these people you hate so much are not litigious and probably won't sue your ass off along with Denise's tits; but at the rate Warren's going, there aren't going to be many followers left to turn the other cheek, and you're going to have some pretty savvy lawyers reminding those now left of the kind of payday they're looking at to meet their "Just wants and needs".



 

JOHNNIE HANNA IS A COP

Johnnie Hanna is a cop from Texas who has had a hard-on for Mormons in his midst since day one of the attack on the Ranch in Eldorado and the subsequent kidnapping, rape and abuse of 465 Mormon children by Texas CPS and CASA.

In my opinion, he was infuriated by the return of those Mormon children to "His" community when the Texas Court of Appeals bitch-slapped the local demagogic "Judge" who is bent on persecuting the Mormons, barbie walthers.

Ever since, the boy with the banana in his pants has been on a personal crusade to avenge that "Travesty of Justice" as he see's it, and has gone out of his way to see to it that these pack of vermin hang from the nearest tree. (Almost back to the good old days.)

My first encounter with Johnnie occurred through some e mails between me and a chick who was trying to groom one of the Mormon children from her bedroom at 1:00 in the morning. The girl really didn't want to go muff diving with the bitch, and she tried to get rid of her. Naturally, barbie and Johnnie thought the chick was doing a great service to the child, so they defended her actions. The chick then tried to use Johnnie against me. I guess Johnnie knew it would be tough to try to explain in open Court why Texas was aiding and abetting the girls grooming by the dyke, so he never pursued the issue with me as the dyke wanted him to.

Following that, Johnnie seemed to appear from under every rock in the case of the kidnapped children:

When the stolen "Evidence" was leaked, it was Johnnie's dated signature on the back of it that appeared in his own hand writing. (He gave out the documents PRIOR to the Search Warrant date that authorized it's taking in the first place)

As the "Official" keeper of the "Evidence", it was Johnnie who had control of the unredacted pictures of children that suddenly and mysteriousely appeared on the Internet. This is against Texas "Law", but lets keep in mind that Johnnie is a cop. Cops in the U.S. are allowed to lie and to fabricate evidence. They can even pretend to be lawyers representing defendants to gain evidence, so passing out pictures of children for folks to droll over was probably rather minor to Johnnie, so long as he had his lynching jones satisfied.

Folks in other States suddenly and mysteriously had possession of the "Evidence" under Johnnies control.

Good old Johnnie was up to his ass two-belts deep in "Evidence" and he just couldn't seem to distribute it around fast enough so long as it put them creepy Mormons necks in those nooses.

Now Johnnie has taken it upon himself to supply that same "Evidence" to another Country to try to get THEM to hang these Mormons for him. Is Canada a County in Texas? Is the "Evidence" his personal property to distribute as he feels fit, or is it part of a criminal trial, subject to Chain of Custody? If the "Evidence" is being freely poured over and distributed to every bigot and hater in two countries, how is its authenticity and integrity being maintained? Does Johnnie even know who has been sifting through the Records and altering them or has he just thrown the door open?  

In 2008, Johnnie found 31 "Children" on the Ranch who were either pregnant, or already had children. This "Proved" these Mormons needed to hang. Johnnies problem was that the oldest of his fantasy "Children" was 37. His story fell apart and Johnnie had to move onto the next story. It wasn't as juicy, but he chose "Broken bones". (We all know how that bullshit turned out.) 

Now Johnnie has found another "31 children" in Canada. Naturally, Daffy Bramham is all over this new revelation from Johnnie like a horsefly is to a pile of shit.

My only question is this:

What is it about the number 31 that attracts Johnnie so much?

Is that how many donuts he can eat at a sitting?

Is that his I.Q.?

Was that his age when he graduated Junior High School?

Is that the number of virgins he's expecting when he dies?

I know what it isn't: Like the 31 "little girls" in Texas, it isn't reality. Then again, it doesn't HAVE to be reality, it's a headline, and folks never forget headlines.
After all, we all know all them boy babies were killed and buried all over the Ranch, don't we Johnnie?

So Johnnie; What is it about little girls and the number 31 that has you drooling?

Dear Internal Revenue Service:

April 2, 2011


Internal Revenue Service
324 25th St
Ogden, Utah 84401

                                                             Re: CASA OF TOM GREEN COUNTY                                                                      75-2169081
                                                                 
                                                                   CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
                                                                   OF TGC, INC.
                                                                    75-2401001

Dear Sirs:

I write this letter asking for a formal investigation into the financial practices of the above indicated entities, CASA of Tom Green County, Texas and CAC of Tom Green County, Texas. Upon information and belief, I believe both entities are using public funds for their private, personal use to avoid paying Tax.

Both entities refuse to divulge public information concerning their financial activities and "Official" travel expenses and that makes this formal request necessary in order to ascertain the proper use of 501 (c) (3) funds for the charities under their control.

No information could be ascertained through public filings of both these entities. CASA's last "Annual" 990 Return filed on their behalf was in 1997, and the last "Annual" 990 filed by CAC was in 2008. Both filings were made though the Office in Ogden. 

We are further hindered from independently verifying proper use of these public funds by the fact that local police, Sheriff's and Texas Rangers refuse to become involved considering the Director of CAC in Tom Green County is also the wife of an Administrative Judge in the County, Mike Brown.

This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that the Texas Rangers, for whatever reason, seem to be incapable of conducting any investigations into wrongdoing in this County due to an ongoing persecution of a local religious group by local judicial and political entities. (In over 3 years now, the Texas Rangers have been "Unable" to establish whether or not an out of State hoax telephone call took place within the County resulting in the illegal seizure of 465 children by the County.

In view of these facts, I ask that you independently determine if CASA and CAC public funds have, and are, being used for personal and private use by members of this particular CASA and CAC group including it's Directors, Debra Brown of CAC and Shirley Davis of CASA.

These are the facts as they are known:

On at least two occasions (April, 2009 and Sept. 2009), Ms. Brown and Ms. Davis, along with 4 other members of CAC and CASA flew to Las Vegas, Nevada.
While there, they rented cars, stayed in hotels, took site-seeing tours, and spent funds, all paid for through CAC and CASA funding. They were not in Nevada on "Official" CAC or CASA business according to the National CASA office in Washington State.

IF these expenses were later reimbursed to CAC and CASA (Which I highly doubt), I submit upon information and belief that no attempt to pay any Taxes due for these expenses were ever made. (At least not prior to a complaint filed with CASA by me) Therefore, the use of the funds as legitimate CASA and CAC expenses were illegal under the Rules and Regulations of the I.R.S.

At MINIMUM, the taxes owed should be reimbursed and the use of these funds in the future should NOT be considered as the private piggy bank or expense account of CASA and CAC employee's and volunteers regardless of who your husband might be.

With one out of every six children in the County being a victim of abuse or neglect according to figures from the Texas Department of Children and Family Services, I would expect a better use of funds intended for those children than using them for private junkets to Las Vegas by the very people charged with protecting them.

Should you have any questions or require additional documentation, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.

Respectfully,

William J. Medvecky
2211 N.E. 1st Terrace
Cape Coral, Florida 33990

239-826-3831

cc: Michael Friedman, Esq.
      Thomas Bolan, Esq. 

WHO DEFINES YOU?

A message for my Fundamentalist Mormon friends:

Any casual review of the current stories out there in the media reveals that the likes of Carolyn Jessop, Becky Musser, Brent Hunsaker, Daphne Bramham and Randy Mankin are defining the F LDS Church and its people.

A more hateful pack of religious bigots and liars would be hard to find. They all share a common agenda: to destroy a Church and its people, down to the last man, woman and child.

Yet, when media wants a sound bite, they dig under the rocks and go find these worms, every single time.

Do ANY of these people know you? Do they know your children, or anything about your life? Do these people speak for you?

They do if you allow them to, and they will unless you speak up for yourselves.

Tell your Elders to appoint someone within your Church and groups to speak for you and to answer the lies, distortions and petty gossip with the Truth.

Tell the media you will no longer allow yourselves to be defined by vermin and filth who would sell their souls for 30 pieces of silver. The F LDS Church is NOT a cult, it is a religious institution. Who tells them that?

You prayed to Heavenly Father to return the children to their homes. He granted you your prayers. Now stand up for Him and let people know who and what you believe in. There CANNOT be any shameful or prideful behavior in doing that, can there?

ANSWERING THEM NOTHING

What is occurring within the F LDS Mormon Church right now is most certainly a private matter and nobody's business but the members of that Church. That's a fact!
However it is also a fact that what went on inside the gates of the Yearning For Zion Ranch in Texas was also a private matter, just as would be the case in anyone else's private home. But that didn't stop the tank and the SWAT teams did it?

More than anything else, what created the attack on the Ranch was the silence of those within when the gossip mongers, bigots, haters and the voyeurs were given a clean slate to offer up the most vile and untruthful slander and libel possible, and it went unchallenged. The pain, sorrow and hurt experienced by the children was a direct result of "Answer them nothing". It egged on the likes of Carolyn, Flora and Randy Mankin.

Now today, we have another situation within the Church, and it is being defined by the likes of Brent Hunsaker and Daphne Bramham, without a doubt, the biggest bigots in town. Does the community wait until they provoke an attack on the twin towns and Bountiful? Does the world get to "See" the F LDS Church through the eyes of these dreck?

In today's world, people believe what is said and printed in the media. That being the case, I would beseech Elder Jessop and the Leadership of the Church to assign a spokesperson from within the Church to speak to the media on behalf of the members rather than to leave it to the apostates who would like nothing better than to see each and every member of the Church dead. Not figuratively, but literally DEAD.

The mistakes of the past need to be rolled back or erased. The children have every right to be raised in the light of day and not have to hide behind walls. You have a wonderful and blessed way of living, and it needs to be celebrated for the world to see, not hidden away like a deep dark family secret; that only encourages the voyeurs of the world and denies you your deserved privacy to Worship as you see fit.

OBSERVATIONS FROM A FRIEND

Being a history buff since the earliest years, all my knowledge concerning Mormons came from my childhood reading about Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, and the great trek to Utah. Later on, I heard about the prurient interests some folks harbored concerning them, but for the most part, chalked it all off to one more form of human voyeurism; Some folks lead such boring and un-fulfilling lives, they simply have to find out whats going on in the other fellows bedroom. If they can't find out, you MUST be doing something wrong!

To me, prior to 2008, Mormons were a group of people who practiced a religion, not unlike Catholics, Protestants, Jews or Hindu's. It was their religion, and their business. Then along came a pack of goons complete with a tank, snipers, SWAT teams, and a group of "Women" I knew from prior personal experience who stole children for fun and profit from parents.

A week prior to April 3, 2008 I underwent surgery for cancer and found myself bed ridden and in front of the computer watching a travesty unfold before my eyes. Knowing the enemy, I knew what they were dragging the men, women and especially the children through, and I resolved to help these people in whatever way I could.

It didn't take all that long to discover that these people were Mormons, and THAT was their great "Crime" in the eyes of the locals and the State of Texas. From the day they moved into town, they were persecuted in the local press on a daily basis for being Mormon. Special Laws were passed against them in Austin for being Mormon, and meetings were held constantly to "Develop" ways to get rid of them. It all came to a head when a professional "Victim" of child abuse used by LE in Colorado by the Local police and FBI made a few simple hoax phone calls that not one Texas Ranger in the entire State seemed to be able to trace, not even 3 years later.

Before all was said and done, Texas CPS and CASA took 465 children, and another 170 women into captivity and took away their Bibles, their access to lawyers, their phones and camera's, and then raped the children under the guise of "Sane" examinations over the next 8 weeks. The attack on the Ranch was orchestrated, financed and staffed by the Texas Supreme Court. Finally, the case was heard before a real court of law, and the children were Ordered returned to their homes and families. Having nothing to legally hang their hats on after Childress failed them, the Texas Supreme Court had no choice but to uphold the Appeals Courts Decision, and the children were then returned home.

I looked forward to returning my life to "Normal" as did my family. That's is exactly what I would have done, had Texas, Utah, Arizona, the Federal government and everybody else just left these people alone, but their persecution of these particular Mormons had only begun. From Harry Reid to a jerk dentist in Utah, their goal is to destroy a group of people for their religion. That might have been OK in 1939 Germany, but it's NOT the America I was brought up in.

So far, the FLDS has won every single case against it that has been heard in a real court of law:

Arizona knew its "Witnesses" would destroy their case against Warren Jeffs and dismissed all charges WITH PREJUDICE. (They can never be brought again).   

Utah's conviction against Warren Jeffs was reversed on Appeal, and they have those same "Witnesses" to contend with and would not retry him. Today, Warren Jeffs stands convicted of NO CRIMES whatsoever. (He's "Cleaner" than Tom DeLay).

The State of Utah and Judge Lindberg, who stole the U.E.P. Trust from these Mormons were recently HUMILIATED by the Federal Courts for un- Constitutionally taking (Stealing) the Trust in the first place.

Now Texas will convict Mr. Jeffs of crimes based upon stolen evidence as they have for 7 men before him. It remains to be seen if the Federal Courts will allow stolen evidence introduced into a trial, but I think NOT.

In the meantime, the Mormons have a man, who they consider to be their leader in the custody and control of the State for the past 6 years on charges that no longer exist. The sanest of men would crack, and the strongest of men could be subdued.

Just as the State of Arizona and the Sheriff made jokes about abusing Warren Jeffs while he was in their custody, Texas also uses Mr. Jeffs for their own amusement and purposes. A rational man would know that writing a letter to the President of the United States is an idiotically foolish thing to do. Does any rational person believe he would actually read it, let alone act on it? For Texas, this became a big joke. Texas has placed a phone at Warren's disposal in jail. Is that phone there to aid Warren Jeffs, or to allow him to be taped making private phone calls to implicate himself or make a fool of himself? After 6 years in an American gulog, it's NOT all that hard to do.
 
Warren understood all of this, and on January 24, 2007 he placed a private call to South Dakota where he spoke to William Edson Jessop. He knew he was being taped. This is a transcript of that call;


Warren Jeffs: Hello

William E. Jessop: Hello sir.

Warren Jeffs: You can hear me?

William Jessop: Yes sir.

Warren Jeffs: Okay. I have this message. The lord has intervened and detected me to myself. He has shown me that I have not held priesthood since I was 20 years old, having been immoral with a sister and a daughter. And father pointing his finger to me was father's test on all of us.

I know of your ordination, that you are the keyholder and I have sent a note with my signature verifying it so that there is no question, according to Section 43, although not valid.

All the ordinance work since father's passing has to be redone and there's many men that were sent away that do hold priesthood and their families will need to be put back.

And then to say this to you. I am one of the most wicked men on the face of the earth since the days of Father Adam.

Okay?

Have you been able to hear me?

William Jessop: Sure.

Warren Jeffs: Thank you and goodbye. You'll need to . . . [Jessop interrupts him]

William Jessop: Good luck.

Warren Jeffs: Thank you. 

On Monday, March 28, 2011, the following was submitted to the State of Utah:

"I, the undersigned, William Edson Jessop, have been called as the President of The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in conformity with the constitution, canons, rites, regulations, or discipline of such church, and by virtue of such calling I am the corporation sole of The Corporation of the President of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, organized under the laws of the State of Utah."

Having first hand knowledge of what jails and prisons can do to people, I'm both hoping and praying that the members of the FLDS both lift the burden of the Presidency off Warren's shoulders so he can concentrate on the Legal battles ahead, while the Stewardship of the Church and its peoples just wants and needs can be met by those in a position to be able to do so.

As it stands today, the Church is running rudderless and defenseless within a sea of sharks all too ready to destroy it.

Much is made about the FLDS being a Patriarchal Society. I know far too many women in the religion to believe that pack of malarkey. The women and girls I have come into contact with are some of the strongest individuals on the planet. They proved that on the Ranch, they prove it every day in the Creek and in Bountiful. If the FLDS is not to be destroyed by the apostates and the government, it will be because the women will simply not allow it to happen, period.

As an outsider, a gentile, any name you wish to call me, I implore you to rally behind Elder Jessop and save the Church rather than to splinter into yet another group which can ONLY aid the enemy of your children and yourselves. Don't think for one moment that they don't intend to raise your children in "Proper" religions, just ask the women on the Ranch how close they came to having their children raised as "Good Baptists".

I love you guys a whole big bunch, and just don't want to see you scatter yourselves to the winds. Please.

GB


 

HAVING KILLED THE GOLDEN GOOSE, TEXAS ENDS UP WITH SQUAB.

Read any Texas rag today and all you'll find is outrage at the financial condition the State is in. In this hurricane of debt, the hairball is balking at using the "Rainy" day fund, mainly because it makes him look like the nitwit he and the Legislature is in this "Most Red of State's". How's he going to become President if he took one of the richest State's in the Nation into the poor house in just the last 4 years when he and his Corporate pals took total control? Does this mean he is going to have to explain his incompetence like Mitt Romney has to explain his Medicare program to the gullibley faithful?  What went wrong? How can they POSSIBLY be so broke today?

Expect the hairball to be hanging his Stetson on "The economy" as the fall guy, along with those "Tax and spend" Liberals. Maybe that will explain why Texas now HAS to raise Taxes, and it's them wonderful teabaggers and conservatives in charge.

Todays piece in "Gosanangelo" had me chuckling. The good old boys are now scrambling with a 1.5 million dollar loss in it's budget coming from Austin and the sky is falling. How fast time fly's!

Just a few short years ago, a money hungry Real Estate Salesman from Eldorado sold a worthless piece of sagebrush and sand to some "Hicks" from out of town for a hefty commission. The "Hicks" then turned the land into the fattest Tax Golden Goose the town and the county had ever seen. The "Hicks" became the second largest taxpayor in the County.

The problem was that the "Hicks" wanted nothing to do with the good old boys in town, and refused to contribute their girls to the already prodigious preggy pool the locals had going in the local Elementary, Junior and High Schools. This pissed off the locals greatly; how dare these ingrates keep their girls to themselves? Who the hell did they think they were?

So the recently retired nooses were brought out of retirement and the new cross burning began, but this time, it was "Mormon's" who needed a hanging. From 2004 until 2008, the stories in the local rag in Eldorado kept up the steady drum beat of stories of dead babies, ritual sex parties, welfare fraud and child abuse going as the "Hicks" just kept writing them Tax checks and closing the Gates of Zion behind them.

Now awash in money, the locals were only too happy when they were handed a phone with the voice of a professional "Child victim" calling from Colorado on the line, claiming to be 10 miles away on the Ranch. It was merely the spark they were praying for to get their hands on those "Poor little girls".

By the States own accounting, they then spent in excess of 14 MILLION dollars within the next 8 weeks to get those young beauties enrolled in the local school districts which would naturally make them more "Available". Money was flowing in Eldorado faster than the diaper supply at SAISD schools. Nothing was off the table, not even Las Vegas junkets by the local CASA.

Once the Court of Appeals put the brakes on the kidnappings and made it impossible for the Texas Supreme Court to overrule them, the locals shut down the information on the tsunami of money they were spending on the "Party" for the "Cattle". The figure of 14 million has been frozen in time and on the States Accounting Books ever since. According to Texas, they haven't spent one penny since May, 2008 on the Great Mormon Pogrom of 2008.

Estimates of the parties costs range between 40 to 75 MILLION dollars, and the spending hasn't stopped and won't until the last lawsuit over the "Party" has been settled by the children who were illegally taken and raped, abused and neglected by the State. Their parents might not sue, but I would not bet on their children once they learn of the potential "Settlements" involved.

The Statute of Limitations on their filing runs out when they turn 21. Since some of those children were still in the womb at the time, that means the clock tolls until 2030 

So what we have now is hand wringing over pennies by the local perverts, while the Goose is dead, the Ranch is building like it's 1950s Levittown, Eldorado and San Angelo are both bleeding jobs and industry like a hemophiliac, and every year the SAISD population of preggy children grows and grows. (Some things never change, no matter how poor the locals get).

I read this story yesterday and tried to find some sympathy for the condition these people now find themselves in. I wasn't successful, after all, they did this to themselves out of lust and greed and reaped what they sowed.

ACCORDING TO GOSANANGELO:

Proposed state budget cuts meant to balance a $27 billion budget deficit may seep away funds from the Tom Green County government.

The county is reporting to Austin how the legislature's proposed budget might impact county residents.

County Judge Mike Brown submitted a document as a form of legislative testimony for House Joint Resolution 56, a bill that demands protection for counties from unfunded mandates.
(Would one of those "Unfunded mandates" be Las Vegas junkets by your wife, Mike?)

"We're kind of in a tough spot," Precinct 4 Commissioner Yantis Green said. "When the Legislature mandates things we do, we don't have a choice but to provide the services. We don't have a choice but to pay the bill. If we are mandated to spend more money, then we have to raise taxes."
(Life is a bitch Yantis, get over it. Maybe if you didn't spend money like water on Mormon lynchings, you'd have a little today?)

According to the testimony document, the total amount Tom Green County could lose — depending on the Texas legislature's decisions for the coming biennium — is more than $1.5 million.
(You USE to collect more than that in Taxes from the Ranch alone. Not after the "Party" pal.)

To keep the same level of service and help effectively support county-related projects, the property tax rate would need to increase by 1.67 cents per $100.
There is no reason to panic, however, Precinct 3 Commissioner Steve Floyd said.
"It's always very fluid," he said about the budgeting process in Austin. "There are all kinds of things that fly through there."

The state's budget would potentially shut down the San Angelo State Supported Living Center, killing 765 Tom Green County jobs, the testimony states.
That comes coupled with a reduction in MHMR services that would cost the county $50,000 a year to help keep the MHMR and the Sheriff's Mental Health Unit afloat.
"We're definitely going to take a hit in services," County Treasurer Dianna Spieker said.
(Those MHMR folks should NEVER have submitted those affidavits concerning the abuse of those Mormons, should they have, Dianna?)

The bill also proposes reducing state grants to juvenile probation by 11 percent, so the county would need to give $244,000 a year to keep things operating as normal.
The state legislature's bill would also decrease funding for the Community Corrections and Supervision Department and would add 7,200 jail days, costing the county $300,000 each year, the testimony states.

The proposed reduction of indigent defense would cause an annual loss of $7,700 to the county, the testimony states.

The testimony also examines the extent to which general government services such as road construction, 911 and library funds would be impacted.

The county would lose $68,000 for general services for the biennium, meaning six miles of road would go unpaved and unmaintained each year, the testimony states.
Losing an axle or gross weight fee would cost the county $30,000, enough to pave and maintain five miles of road each year, the testimony document states.
The document states that reducing mixed beverage tax reimbursements could cost $122,500 over the next biennium.

A 28 percent decrease in grant assistance for a 911 mapping position may cost the county $23,500 over the next two years, the testimony document states.
An essential services grant that the county has been using to help pay for "unanticipated and extraordinary criminal justice related expenditures," according to the testimony document, may end and cost the county $32,740 over the next two years.

The county may also lose funds for the county library, which it was using to upgrade and add an electronic book library. Loss of those funds would come to $44,000 for the coming biennium.

Continuing education grants may be lost, so the county wouldn't get $28,100 over the next two years.

"The Medicare and Medicaid cuts and the cuts to MHMR concern me the most," Green said.

The Medicaid losses do not figure into county government, but the county could lose $24.4 million from a proposed 10 percent cut in Medicaid spending, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities.

MAYBE YOU BOYS NEED TO APPLY TO THE RANCH FOR A LOAN?

  The locals see the new buildings going up on the Ranch as a new source of tax revenue. My NY Jewish Accountant and Tax Attorney eyes see's the new buildings as "Dormitories" and "Classrooms" for the children attending their Academy.